Skip to tutoring
Use my personal saved workspace

Public practice below stays in page memory only. Start the saved workspace before working if you want account-based save/resume; public answers are not transferred into an account.

Self-paced · English I EOC Tutoring

Planning & revising

Complete source-unit instructional sequence adapted for independent tutoring, with a small unit-level diagnostic and separate fresh reassessment items. All named source lessons remain available in this unit. Five initial check/practice items reuse reviewed source questions; two reassessment items are original and distinct. The checks sample selected unit skills, not every standard. Written work is ungraded and self-reviewed; completing this unit is not a verified STAAR readiness claim.

1 focused skill · About 100 minutes · Untimed

Find a starting point

A short diagnostic

Answer 2 questions before studying. Two questions sample each skill; an unanswered skill is not a failed skill. You can change answers until you check them.

Which organization best answers a question about change?

THE FIRST FORM — original fictional memoir-style passage When I first helped my father complete an online job form, I mistook speed for competence. I clicked through the screens while he searched a folder for dates. “I know this part,” I said whenever he leaned toward the monitor. The little spinning wheel made us both impatient. Then the form asked him to explain a difficult problem he had solved. I typed “worked hard” into the box. He shook his head. He described a machine that kept stopping, the worn part he had discovered, and the schedule he reorganized while it was repaired. I deleted my two words and listened. By the final screen, our roles had changed. I still knew where to click. He knew what the story needed to say. We read the answer aloud together before submitting it. The computer had not made either of us an expert in the other person’s work. It had given us a reason to notice what each of us knew.

Which revision preserves appropriate uncertainty?

COOLER STOPS, CAREFUL CONCLUSIONS — original informational text; all data below are fictional teaching data (1) Shade can change a bus stop’s conditions, but deciding where to install it requires more than noticing that summer is hot. A neighborhood team compared two stops on the same route. Stop A had a canopy; Stop B did not. At noon on three clear days, a sensor at the same height recorded lower air temperatures at A. Both stops had paved surfaces, although the surrounding buildings differed. (2) Observation summary: shaded A averaged 32°C; unshaded B averaged 35°C. Thirty riders answered an optional survey: 24 preferred shaded stops. The temperature comparison describes these locations during the observation period. The voluntary survey describes those respondents, not necessarily every rider. Neither result alone proves that a canopy caused the entire difference. (3) A stronger follow-up would measure more sites before and after installation, record wind and nearby surfaces, and use the same measurement procedures. Temperature is only one consideration. A canopy should also leave wheelchair access clear, preserve drivers’ sight lines, and receive regular maintenance. (4) The team therefore recommended a limited pilot rather than an immediate claim of universal success. Its report moves from a local problem to initial evidence, then to limitations and a practical next step. Evaluating the pilot would reveal whether a promising design works under additional conditions. DATA PANEL — mean of three noon observations Stop A | Canopy | 32°C Stop B | No canopy | 35°C Caption: Two locations; buildings differ; these observations cannot isolate every cause.